What features do Articulate Storyline and Rise offer that make good use cases for the Veracity Learning LRS dashboard to help analyze learning performance metrics?
In this article, the star ratings show the degree to which Articulate offers xAPI to support each of the following metrics, with illustrations for the most effective ones.
Course Metrics ★★★☆☆
Storyline and Rise offer the same xAPI metrics at the course-level that the LMS gets — completion
, success
, and duration
. So, the advantage that the xAPI data that arrives in the Veracity Learning LRS is for integration of LMS-level data with other analysis and Business Intelligence tools, such as Power BI, SQL, and Tableau.
Lesson Metrics ★☆☆☆☆
Articulate doesn’t offer any granularity automatically, just course
and module
, where a “module” is a Storyline Slide or Rise Block. The only exception is if a module has a Quiz, then that CMI interaction
shows-up as a child in context
of the module, in the xAPI statements.
Another special case is in Storyline, an author can choose to group Quiz slides (e.g., pre-test versus final assessment) using Result slides, which then align each group to an objective
in xAPI with success
and score
. Then, in the Veracity Learning LRS, an analyst can filter-on the objective to see some aggregate performance in a long course. However, this aggregation is not automatic and can easily fail.
Aggregation of metrics by anything other than whole course is difficult. If an author breaks-up a course into separate files, then the problem is associating each file’s xAPI with the rest. In the LRS, each of these ad hoc “lessons” would have a unique registration
, so the only way to associate them together is by extrapolation: e.g., by a manually-maintained list of object
or context ID
values.
Page Metrics ★★★★★
Articulate Storyline and Rise both track duration
per module
, unlike many other authoring tools. In the Veracity Learning LRS, this offers an opportunity to evaluate students’ attention as a trend across the length of the course. This can give the author an insight to the students’ average “time on task” and help them re-design the course as needed.
Typically, students spend more time in multimedia and interactions: e.g., knowledge reviews. Pages that take a few seconds to consume usually have only a title and bullets, or a single short paragraph.
The session duration of the course includes time the student spent other than “on task”, so the median value of the total duration of all the pages can offer a more accurate “seat time” for the course.
Chart of average slide duration in a Storyline course, each a unique type of graded question.
Interaction Metrics ★★★★☆
Both Articulate Storyline and Rise each support many interaction types
. Each tool sends robust xAPI statements for the choice
and matching
types, plus sequencing
in Storyline. In the dashboard, the widgets not only show the score and duration, but automatically improve readability of the choices and responses.
In Storyline, any Quiz slide with a graded question, survey question, or freeform question that points to a Result slide will send xAPI statements.
However, while Storyline and Rise do send xAPI for other interaction types — fill-in
, Likert
, and numeric
— the statements are not well-formed.
Typical out-of-the-box widgets that show performance in CMI interactions.
Neither Articulate Storyline nor Rise send xAPI data for media activity. The only system events that Storyline lets the author use as triggers for custom xAPI are “when the user clicks <Video 1>”, and “when <Video 1> completes”. No tracking of pause, rewind, or seek activities.